|
| | Study Citations
Last updated 02/01/2008
[For update history,
click here]
This page is a list of citations only:
Multi-breed
Study Citations
Single-breed
Study Citations
For a table of longevity data from these studies,
see the Breed Data page.
|
Health and longevity studies can be multi-breed
studies, in which data for a large number of breeds are collected at the
same time with the same methods, or single-breed
studies, in which data are collected for one breed, or sometimes two or
three related breeds. Multi-breed studies are generally
better for comparing longevity among breeds if sample sizes are large
enough. Unfortunately, the sample sizes for individual breeds are
often small, except for the most common breeds. Single-breed
studies usually have much larger sample sizes for a breed than
multi-breed studies, especially
if the breed is rare. Inter-breed comparisons of longevities
obtained from single-breed studies must be made with caution, however,
because the methods, quality of analyses, and report-writing skills of
the people that conduct single breed studies are highly variable.
A few single-breed studies have been done by university researchers, and
these studies generally (but not universally) have more rigorous
analyses and are better written. Most single-breed studies are conducted by
dedicated club members who are unpaid or minimally paid.
Sometimes, these efforts produce reports that rival those of the
university researchers; others are very poorly analyzed and written.
|
|
Referred to as: Vet
School Data 1980-1990
Reference:
Patronek, G. J., D. J. Waters, and L. T. Glickman, 1997. Comparative
longevity of pet dogs and humans: Implications for gerontology research.
The Journals of Gerontology, 1997, 52A, 3: Health Module p. B171-B178.
Link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=
pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9158552&query_
hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum {Abstract only via Entrez PubMed.
Last accessed March 14, 2007)
Description:
Data in this study came from the Veterinary Medical Database of dogs
seen at 20 American and 2 Canadian veterinary schools. Included
dogs >1 yr in age that died or were euthanized at vet hospitals
between 1980 and 1990, excluding dogs that died of trauma or
poisoning. Included records for 38,006 dogs, of which 9,041 (23.8%)
were mixed breed dogs and 28,965 (76.2%) were purebred dogs.
My
comments: Median longevities of dogs in this study are usually 50% to
75% of median longevities obtained from questionnaire surveys (See Survey
Comparisons page). Possible reasons for this
large discrepancy include: 1) dogs that are very old are
probably more likely to be euthanized by a local vet or to die at home
than to be brought to a vet school for treatment, and 2) vet schools tend to
receive the most unusual cases, so the population is not likely to be
representative of the wider dog population. Despite these problems, the vet school data are
somewhat useful for ranking longevity among breeds and comparing mixed and purebred
dog longevity.
|
| Referred to as: British
Owner Survey 1999
Reference:
Michell, A. R., 1999. Longevity of British breeds of dog and its
relationships with sex, size, cardiovascular variables and disease.
Veterinary Record 145:625-629.
Link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=
Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=10619607&query_hl=
3&itool=pubmed_docsum (Abstract only via Entrez Pubmed.. PDF of
entire article available through a research library account. Last
accessed March 14, 2007)
Description:
Based on responses to a questionnaire sent to dog owners whose names
were obtained from the database of a large pet insurance company and
also distributed at the Crufts Dog Show. Included 2,497 (84%) purebred dogs and 475 (16%) mixed-breed dogs. Median age at
death for all dogs in the survey was 12 years. The median age at death
for mixed-breed dogs was 13.2 years.
My comments: Dogs
in this study have higher median longevities than other studies,
possibly because dog owners that buy pet insurance are more likely than
the general dog owning population to
give their dogs optimum care. While the total number of dogs in the
survey was high, the sample sizes per breed were often very low.
There were data for 67 "breeds," with Lurchers (sighthound
mixes) considered a breed and some related breeds or varieties treated
as a single breed,
such as Corgis. Of the 67 breeds, only six had a sample size of
greater than 100 dogs.. For 41 (61%) breeds, median longevities were based on
sample sizes of less than 20 dogs.
|
| Referred to as: (UK)
Kennel Club Survey 2004 Reference: KC/BSAVA. 2004.
KC/BSAVA Purebred dog health survey. (United Kingdom) Kennel Club and
British Small Animal Veterinary Association. There are apparently
no print publications of survey analyses, but the results are online.
Link: http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/549
Study summary: http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/549
Individual breed results: http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/570
Description: Based on a
survey sent to the largest breed club in the UK for each breed.
The survey was distributed to club members. Mixed breed dogs were
not surveyed. Analyses were based on 15,881 deceased dogs, representing
165 breeds. Morbidity and age distribution were analyzed for
36,006 live dogs. Results are reported only for those breeds for
which the survey response was at least 15%, so only data for 139 of the
165 breeds are available. Median age at death for all dogs
in the survey was 11.25 years.
My comments: This is, by
far, one of the best studies available for making breed
comparisons. Data for 139 breeds are included and sample numbers
for most breeds are reasonably high. Sample size (deceased dogs):
0 to 9 dogs
22 breeds
10 to 19 dogs
15
breeds
20 to 49 dogs
32 breeds
50 to 99 dogs
24 breeds
100 to 199 dogs
28 breeds
200 or more dogs
18 breeds
This is the most accessible multi-breed
study, because
results are
on-line. Most of the other multi-breed studies require access to a research library
or to a library that allows access to on-line journals.
On the downside, the survey was sent
primarily to members of UK breed clubs, so is not likely to represent
typical dog owners. No mixed breeds were included in the survey,
so purebred and mixed-breed longevities cannot be compared.
A 15%
response rate, instead of a minimum sample size, was required for
analysis. This requirement, while reasonable, led to some strange
results. Mortality analyses are presented for some rare breeds with a sample
size of less than 5 (including one breed with no deceased dogs in the
sample)
while some very common breeds (e.g. German Shepherd Dogs) have no
analyses posted, presumably because the response rate
was less than 15%. |
| Referred to as: Denmark
Kennel Club Survey 2003
Reference: Proschowsky, H.
F., H. Rugbjerg, and A. K. Ersbell. 2003. Mortality of purebred and
mixed-breed dogs in Denmark. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 58:63-74.
Link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=
AbstractPlus&list_uids=12628771&query_hl=5&itool=pubmed_docsum
(Abstract only via Entrez PubMed. Entire article available online if you
access to a research library with a subscription.)
Description: Based on a
questionnaire study among members of the Danish Kennel Club in
1997. 2,982 dogs, including 2,650 purebred dogs and 278 mixed
breed dogs. Results presented for only 20 breeds, all with sample
sizes of more than 30 per breed. Other breeds were grouped into
categories, e.g., "Other Pointing Dogs" or "Sighthounds."
Median age at death for all dogs and all purebred dogs in the survey was
10.0 years. Median age of mixed-breed dogs was 11.0 years.
My comments: The number of
specific breeds (instead of breed groups) was low, but they included
mixed-breeds in their survey and had a few breeds for which little or no
other data were available (Chow Chow and Small Munsterlander).
|
The mixed-breed study is listed
first, followed by the purebred studies in alphabetical order by breed
| Mixed-breed |
|
| Mixed-breed |
Source:
Data collected as part of John Armstrong's Canine Diversity Project
. http://www.canine-genetics.com/health.htm#life Graph of
Mixed-breed data at: http://www.canine-genetics.com/xblife.html
Link: See Source. (Last accessed
April 15, 2007)
Description and Comments:
One of John Armstrong's
on-line surveys done in the late 1990s. He had longevity data on 328
Mixed-breed dogs. The country of residence of the dogs is
unknown. Since most of the requests were to USA and Canadian email
lists, most of the responses were probably from those countries.
Longevities were not calculated for separate size groups. |
| Purebred |
|
| Airedale
Terrier |
Source:
Airedale Terrier Health Survey 2000-2001. Airedale Terrier Club of
America in collaboration with L. Glickman from the Purdue School of
Veterinary Medicine.
Link: http://www.vet.purdue.edu/epi/Airedale%20final%20report_revised.pdf
(Last accessed March 27, 2007)
Description: One of the
Purdue University breed studies. Detailed, long, and with more rigorous statistical
analyses than most other single-breed studies. Questionnaires
were mailed to Airedale Terrier Club of America members and other
Airedale Terrier owners and were posted on the Club web site.
Included dogs alive as of January 1, 1995. Survey ended June 1,
2001. About 90% of surveyed participants lived in the USA, 8.5% in
Canada. Methods section says up to five dogs per owner were allowed,
but questionnaire itself says up to ten dogs. Usable results
received from 331 owners for 519 dogs. Mortality information based on
208 dogs that had died by the end of the survey, of which 165 had cause
of death determined by a veterinarian. |
| Akita |
Source:
Akita Club of America National Health Survey 2000-2001. Prepared by Purdue School of Veterinary Medicine, L.
Glickman, N. Glickman, and M Raghaven, in consultation with the Akita
Club of America Health and Genetics Committee.
Link: http://www.vet.purdue.edu/epi/akita_final_2.pdf
(Last accessed March 17, 2007)
Description: One of the
Purdue University breed studies. Detailed, long, and with more rigorous statistical
analyses than most other single-breed studies. Methods
section does not specify how they found Akita owners, however, Linda
Wroth (Health and Genetics Chair of the Club at the time of the survey)
explained "The survey first went out in hard copy to ACA members,
but the availability of the survey was posted on the major Akita
computer lists so non-ACA members and pet owners were included.
Because of a strong support of rescue, we had a number of rescue people
submitting info on rescued Akitas. We publicized the survey in local
Akita club newsletters or Web pages and finally posted it online on
ACA's Web site for anyone to use. I feel we got a fairly good
cross-section of Akitas" (personal communication, Linda
Wroth, via email, Oct 3, 2007). 97% of
surveyed dogs were born in USA or Canada. The survey included
dogs alive or born after January 1, 1995. The deadline for
responses was June 1, 2000. Multiple dog owners were asked to submit data for up to
5 dogs, and to select the five based on earliest born.
Usable responses were submitted by 277 owners for 603 dogs, of which 438
were alive on January 1, 1995 and 165 were born after that time.
Mortality calculations based on 164 dogs that had died, including 103
whose cause of death had been determined by a veterinarian. |
| American
Cocker Spaniel |
Source:
Cocker Spaniel Comprehensive Breed Health Survey, First Summary
Report, December 8, 2003. The American Spaniel Club Foundation and the
American Spaniel Club. Prepared by C. Thomas.
Link: http://www.asc-cockerspaniel.org/health/surveyreports.asp
(Last accessed February 2007.)
Description and Comments: This is a preliminary
report based on the first six weeks of data collection for an ongoing
health survey. (See the link above to
contribute to the survey). The survey is based on dogs that were
alive or born after January 1, 2001. This preliminary data set consisted
of 20 deceased and 186 live dogs. All but four dogs resided in the
USA or Canada. |
| Australian
Shepherd |
Source:
Data collected as part of John Armstrong's Canine Diversity Project
http://www.canine-genetics.com/health.htm#life. Graph of Australian
Shepherd data available at: http://www.canine-genetics.com/aussielife.html
Link: See Source. (Last accessed
February 2007)
Description and Comments:
One of John Armstrong's
on-line surveys done in the late 1990s. Longevity data
split into two time periods: dogs born pre-1980 and dogs born 1980 to
1998. John put total sample size (619 dogs) on the web site but did not
indicate how many were in each time period.
CA Sharp, who helped Armstrong with the Aussie data, is currently trying to track down that information. In
the meantime, I estimated 300 dogs per time period. The post-1980 data were corrected to adjust for dogs still
living. |
| Australian
Terrier |
Source:
Australian Terrier Club of America. 2002 ATCA Health Survey
Results. [Note: There is not a direct link to the ATCA 1997 Health
Survey, but the results are discussed extensively in the 2002 Survey
Report]
Link: http://australianterrier.org/survey_02.htm
(Last accessed Feb 2007)
Description:
Surveys were mailed to Australian Terrier Club of America members and
club newsletter subscribers. Surveys were also available to non-club
members. Surveys were received from 176 owners for 619 dogs. 91% of dogs resided in the
USA or Canada, 5.2% in the UK. The rest were scattered over several
countries. Mortality based on 145 dogs.
2002 survey report includes
a comparison with the 1997 survey, which had 86 respondents with 65
deceased dogs. The number of live dogs in the 1997 survey was not clear. The
time periods covered by the two surveys are not stated in the 2002
report. |
| Bearded
Collie |
1992
and 1996 Surveys
Source (1992): Bearded Collie Club of America
Health Survey (1992). Beardie Bulletin, Part 1. May 1994, 24/1, pp 7-11
and Part 2 February 1995, 24/4, p. 8-14. Reports written by Linda
Aronson
Source (1996): Presented as part of the
BCCA Health Committe Annual Report for 1997-1998. (But report suggests
survey was not sponsored by BCCA. Not clear exactly who to cite.).
Although called a 1996 health survey, the data apparently come from
surveys submitted from 1997 and 1998.
Link (to both surveys): http://www.beaconforhealth.org/HealthSurveys.htm
(Last accessed July 22, 2007) Link includes both surveys, both in
two parts.
Description: There is little information in
either survey about methods used to collect data, except that
respondents all appear to have been members of BCCA and the vast
majority were from the USA. The 1992 report contains no
information on mortality. The writer of the report also injects many
personal opinions on each result section which detracts somewhat from
the report. Nonetheless, the high sample size (804 dogs) and
reasonably detailed tables of health issues make it a valuable morbidity
survey.
The 1996 report also has a large sample size: 1397
dogs, including 269 deceased dogs (257 with age at death
reported). It included both mortality and morbidity data.
The report lacks much detail about methods. There is a hint that
autoimmune incidence in the survey may be higher than in the general
population, but it's not clear from the sparse methods description why
the author thinks that may be the case. It is called a 1996
survey, evidently because data collection began in 1996, but all the
data tables indicate the data are actually from 1997 and 1998. Age
at death is reported as average of 10.3, but table of percent of death
in each age groups also allows calculation of median age of death
(usually preferred over the average), which is 12 years, including
accidental deaths. Without accidental deaths, the median appears to be
slightly over 12 years. |
| Belgian
Tervuren |
Source:
2003 American Belgian Tervuren Club Health Survey. American Belgian
Tervuren Club and Richard Evans (Iowa State University).
Link: On three web pages that aren't linked to
one another. The only indication they are a group of pages is in the
Club Site Map. Summary: http://www.abtc.org/health_ed/survey_2003.htm
Background (Owner, living environment, dog statistics, and temperament):
http://www.abtc.org/health_ed/Health_background.htm
Health Conditions: http://www.abtc.org/health_ed/Health_issues.htm
(All sites last accessed August 4, 2007)
Description: Survey distributed to ABT Club
members, and responses accepted from April to October 2003 for dogs
alive as of January 1, 2000. Collected information on 633 Tervs (526
living, 105 deceased, 2 unknown) from 278 owners. 274 respondents lived
in USA, 4 in Canada, and 1 unknown. Used average longevity.
1998 Survey: The ABTC club also did a 1998
health survey, but the report is sparse and their is no mortality
information.
Source (1998): MacManus, Don. 1998 Tervuren
Health Survey. Originally published in Tervuren News Tales Dec/Jan 1999.
Link: http://www.abtc.org/Retired/healthSurvey.htm
(Last accessed August 4, 2007)
Description: No information on methodology
provided in the web link except that there were 2,157 Tervs
included. With such a large sample size, it is disappointing that
there are no mortality data or methods, but there is a list of the
number of dogs with health and temperament issues. The health and
temperament data are similar to the results of the 2003
survey. |
|
Bernese
Mountain Dog |
Source:
2000 BMDCA Health Survey, Bernese Mountain Dog Club of America
Link: http://www.bmdca.org/health/Miscellaneous/Health_Report.php
(Last accessed August 2007)
Description:
Collected information on health status of 1,325 dogs alive in
1996-1997 and mortality information on 261 dead dogs as of 1999. Results
reported as average (not median) age at death in months: 84.43 months
including 10 accidental deaths; 84.44 months excluding accidental
death. Country of residence not reported; presumably, most dogs
lived in the USA or Canada. |
| Bichon
Frise |
Source:
Bichon Frise Club of America, Health Web Site, Health Survey Reports
Link: http://www.bichonhealth.org/SurveyInstruct.asp
(Last accessed August 18, 2007)
Description: This is a nice collection of
Bichon health surveys from many sources. The least biased and most
complete survey is the Breeder Survey. It included 36 respondents and
1000 Bichons, which is an average of 28 dogs/breeder. An average of
about 7 dogs (68% female and 32% male) were currently living with each
breeder. These breeders were clearly not representative of the
typical pet owner, but the web site also has two compilations of
questions by Bichon owners via email or the Club web site. Most of
the questions were health questions. There is a survey of
veterinarians asking for their impressions of what health problems occur
more or less often than other breeds. And, last, there is a survey
of health problems of rescued Bichons.
These surveys are remarkably consistent with respect
to the leading health issues among Bichon. The vet survey seems
most different but probably because they were asking for vet impressions
rather than information on individual dogs. Among living Bichons,
skin/allergy/atopy issues rank highest, with dental disease, patellar
luxation/anterior cruciate ligament tears, and urinary stones are also
major issues.
Mortality: Only the breeder survey includes
mortality data. Unfortunately, it is somewhat obscure and even a
bit disguised. Longevity data are not given in the summary.
In Part 6 Cause of Death, there is a section labeled "Average life
span" which is evidently a list of what breeders thought the
average Bichon life span was. The majority of breeders (10 of 19
who answered) reported 15 yrs. The lowest average given was 12
years by a single breeder and one breeder estimated 18 years. The report
goes on to list cause of deaths, the number of dogs dying from that
cause, and the age of the dog at death, if provided. I put all the
responses with an age of death into an Excel file and calculated a
median age of 12 years from the data provided. In fact, I suspect
the actual median was lower because the cause of death for which
respondents most often failed to report age was "Unknown" and
the 4 of 25 dogs with a reported age in that category all died younger
than 12. The total number of dogs with a reported cause of
death was 174. The number of dogs with age at death given was 112.
Years lost: Since I had the ages at death for
each cause of death in the breeder survey, I could calculate the cause
of death responsible for the greatest number of "years
lost." I subtracted the median age at death for each cause of
death from 12 years (the median of all causes) and multiplied by the
number of dogs dying from that cause. By far, the cause of death
responsible for the greatest number of years lost is Hematological and
split almost equally between AIHA (autoimmune hemolytic anemia) and ITP
(immune-mediated thrombocytopenia). These hematological causes of death
affect 11-17% of Bichons with an median age at death of 5 years.
Other, more common causes of death, kill at much older ages. |
Bouvier
des Flandres |
Source:
Bouvier Health Foundation. 2004 Bouvier Health Survey. Released
2005. Presented by Margaret Slater. Link:
http://www.bouvierhealthfoundation.org/health_survey.htm
(Last accessed Feb 2007) Description:
Health and longevity survey of 2410 live and 1040 deceased dogs.
Longevity reported as median in the tables and mean in the
summary. Accidents and euthanasia included in longevity
calculations. No information about country of residence of dogs,
but surveys were mailed to members of the American Bouvier Club, so most
dogs were probably in the USA or Canada. Deceased dogs had died
since 1988. |
| Boxer |
Source:
Eichelberg, H. 1990. Todesursachen beim Boxer. Boxer Blatter 12/90,
pp. 888-891. (In German)
Link: No link to the original article. This
is a link to my English translation of the article.
Description: One of the few studies to compare
mortality of a breed in two time periods, in this case German boxers in
1983 and 1989. This is an earlier study than most of the other
studies cited. Sample sizes are large, especially for a country as small
as Germany. The 1983 study included 1271 deceased boxers and the 1989
study included 549 deceased boxers. On the down side, the methodology is
poorly described. |
|
Cavalier King
Charles Spaniel |
Source:
American Cavalier King Charles Spaniel Club, Inc., Health Survey
2004-2005.
Link: http://www.ackcsc.org/health/ckcshealthsurveyfinalreport.pdf
(Last accessed Feb 2007) Description:
One of the Purdue University breed
studies. Included information on 478
live and 88 deceased dogs. 88% of the dogs lived most of the their life
in the USA and Canada. Owners were asked to complete survey
information for up to 5 dogs alive as of Jan 1, 2001. Survey ended Feb
1, 2005. |
|
Chesapeake Bay
Retriever |
Source:
American Chesapeake Club Health Committee. 2004. American Chesapeake
Club Health Survey. Susan Hyde, 2004 chair. Link:
http://www.amchessieclub.org/survey/index.html
(Last accessed Feb 2007) Description:
Survey sent out in 2003 and covered dogs owned within the 10 years
before that date. Total of 3,564 dogs. I could not find the total
number of respondents in the report, but other information in the report
allows an estimate. It is stated that "Responding households
represent a total of 1,666 dogs in current residence - an average of 2.6
animals per household." Dividing the number of living dogs by
the number of dogs per household gives 641 respondents. It is also
stated that "Considering the 10-year range of this survey, this
expands to include a total of 3,564 animals, or an average of 5.5 per
responding household." Dividing 3,564 by 5.5 gives 648. The
discrepancy (641 vs 648 respondents) might have due to rounding or
typos. The survey report itself
does not indicate the number of dogs still living vs the number deceased
at the time of the survey, but one of the people
involved in the survey (Lisa Van Loo) reported in response to my inquiry
that the mortality data were based on 377 owners and 731 dogs.
Besides mortality data for all 731 dogs over the 10 year time period,
owners were also asked the age at death of their most recent dog. The
actual number of "most recent dogs" is not explicitly
stated. If each of the 377 owners reported the death of a
"most recent dog," then 377 of the 731 deceased dogs would be
"most recent." The
total number of dogs (3,564) minus the number of current dogs in
residence (1,666) is 1,898, which is far more than the number of dogs
reportedly used for mortality calculations, but I do not know what
accounts for the discrepancy. NOTE
TO ANYONE INVOLVED IN THE SURVEY: If you know the real numbers of
respondents, deceased dogs, and "most recent dogs," please
email me at lostriver@completebbs.com This survey reports the incidence of
health problems in Chessies, but does not report causes of death. |
Clumber
Spaniel |
Source:
Data collected as part of John Armstrong's Canine Diversity Project
. http://www.canine-genetics.com/health.htm#life
Graph of Clumber
Spaniel data at: http://www.canine-genetics.com/csmortality.html
Link: See Source. (Last accessed
February 2007)
Description and Comments:
One of John Armstrong's
on-line surveys done in the late 1990s. He had longevity data on 301
Clumber Spaniels. The time period over which the dogs died is unknown. |
Dalmatian |
Source:
Dalmatian Club of America. 2001 Health Survey. Results available 2002. Link:
http://www.thedca.org/survey.html
(Last accessed Feb 2007) Description: Dalmatian
owners worldwide were asked to download a survey form and return the
form hardcopy for each Dalmatian. Surveys were filled out and
mailed between April 1, 2001 and March 31, 2002. Not clear from the
methods write-up whether there were restrictions on when the dogs had to
be alive. Total of 809 dogs from 255 owners. 93% of
respondents lived in the USA(87%) or Canada (4%) This survey asked
some interesting questions and got interesting results. For
example, Dalmatians that had been bred lived 1.5 yrs longer than dogs
never bred. Performance Dalmatians lived longer than breed, show,
or companion/pet Dalmatians. Dalmatians kept in crates in the
house did not live as long as Dalmatians left free in the house or kept
in a fenced yard or kennel. Unfortunately, none of these intriguing
results, were subjected to statistical tests to determine whether
these differences were significant. However, the results are
interesting enough that other survey designers and analysts should
considering including some of these questions. |
|
Dogue de
Bordeaux |
Source: Dogue
de Bordeax Society. DDBS Causes of Death in the Dogue de Bordeaux Survey
Results. Last updated August 1, 2002.
Link: http://www.ddbs.org/longevityresults.html
(Last accessed March 4, 2007) Description:
An online survey. Data are continuing to be collected. Has
results from surveys completed as of December 1, 2001 and August 1,
2002, but numbers are too low and time periods too close together to
draw any conclusions about longevity trends. I used only the
combined data, with a total of 79 dogs. This survey had only a few
questions about longevity and cause of death, with no information about
country of residence. This is the shortest-lived breed (median 5.3
yr) for which I have found a survey with a reasonable sample size.
Top three causes of death are cancer, heart disease, and bloat. |
|
English Cocker
Spaniel |
1998
Survey: Source:
Slater, M. R. 1998. English Cocker Spaniel Health Survey, final
report. December 16, 1998. English Cocker Spaniel Club of America. Link:
http://www.ecsca.org/98healthsur.html
(Last accessed March 4, 2007) Description:
Surveys were mailed to all ECSCA members. Response rate 55%.
Survey information from 373 owners with 2,476 adult English Cocker
Spaniels, and 1,888 puppies. Mortality data based on 257 deceased
dogs. Life span is apparently the average, rather than the median.
Included accidents and euthanasia for behavior problems in mortality
figures. The time period covered by the survey is not clear. 2002
Survey: Source:
Slater, M. R. 2004. The 2002 English Cocker Spaniel Health Survey
Report. English Cocker Spaniel Club of America. Link:
http://www.ecsca.org/healthsurvey02.html
(Last accessed March 4, 2007) Description:
Surveys mailed to all ECSCA members between December 31,
2001 and January 10, 2002, requesting responses by February 14,
2002. Several reminders were sent to members who did not return
surveys. There was a 65% response rate. Total of 487 owners, 287
of which were breeders. Included a total of 3,537 dogs. Mortality based
on 450 deceased dogs. No info on country of residence but since this was
the ECSC of America, majority were likely in USA or Canada. The time
period covered by the survey is not clear. 2007
Survey: Source:
English Cocker Spaniel Club of America. The 2007 English Cocker Spaniel Health Survey
Report. English Cocker Spaniel Club of America. Link:
http://www.ecsca.org/healthsurvey07.html
(Last accessed July 8, 2007) Description:
The 1998 and 2002 surveys were well-done, so it was a surprise to see
how poorly designed this subsequent survey was. This was the club's
first on-line survey. It apparently did not involve the assistance of
university researcher like the prior two surveys did. The survey
design was extremely poor and results are impossible to compare to the
prior surveys. Each respondent was allowed one survey per
household. Instead of asking about single dogs, questions were phrased
to ask about problems owners had encountered, apparently with any
dog. Longevity was addressed by the question: "What is the
average life span of your dogs?" possibly the worst method of
trying to assess true longevity. Because
of its very serious design flaws, I consider this 2007 survey to be
virtually worthless. |
| Flat-coated
Retriever |
Source:
Slater, M. R., and J. Tomochek. 1997. A general health survey of
Flat-coated Retrievers. Sharon Myers Breed Health Committee of the
Flat-coated Retriever Society of America.
Link: There is no internet link to the
survey or, as of December 2007, an easy way to obtain a hard copy of the
survey. I was able to obtain a copy via a helpful flat-coat breeder. I
can only suggest contacting the FCR Society Health Committee to find
someone who will send a copy.
Description: Surveys were sent in late 1996 to owners of
Flat-coated Retrievers whose addresses were supplied by the FCR Society
of America. Of 966 recipients of the survey, 816 returned the
survey, for a response rate of 85%. Of these, 19 respondents had
no FCR or co-owned dogs for which the other owner completed the survey.
There were 771 usable USA respondents and 27 non-USA respondents. The
total number of USA dogs was 1991 (1457 living and 534 deceased). The
total number of non-USA dogs was 132 (100 living and 32
deceased). Non-USA respondents were from Canada, England, Denmark,
and Australia. Respondents were asked to provide information on
all dogs that had been alive for at least some period since January 1,
1980. The survey and survey report were succinct, but included some
statistical analyses of differences between male and female health
issues. Life spans are reported as medians. Median life spans of
male and female dogs were the same (8.0 yrs). The median life spans of
USA and non-USA dogs were also the same (8.0 yrs), but the non-USA sample was very
small. |
|
Field Spaniel |
Source:
Field Spaniel Society of America. 2003. Field Spaniel Health Survey.
Link: http://clubs.akc.org/fssa/about.html#d
(Last accessed March 9, 2007) Description:
Survey conducted from November 2002 through March 2003. Says most
respondents were from the USA "with some from Canada, the UK,
Australia, Sweden, and other counties not identified", but no
percentages given. Information from 184 owners. Total of 437
dogs, 71 deceased and 366 living. Reported age at death as the
average, not median. Reported both average age of death of all
dogs (8.2 yrs) and excluding dogs that died of birth defects or
accidents (8.6 yrs). |
| German
Shepherd Dog |
Source: American
German Shepherd Dog Charitable Foundation, Inc. 2004. Health Survey.
Link: http://www.agsdcf.org/home.html
(Last accessed March 9, 2007)
Description:
Information about health problems and longevity of 566 dogs,
collected via an on-line survey. Does not indicate time period
covered by the survey or the country of residence. Survey results
had one of the more unusual presentations. Results reported as a list of
ailments and the number of dogs reported to have the condition, with no
further analysis. Longevity reported as the number of dogs
reported to live 1-2 years, 2-3 years, etc., with no analysis. I
calculated median from their data, but their last category is
"Longevity 12+ years." From the data provided, I estimated the
median at about 10 yrs. Causes of death were not provided. |
| Golden
Retriever |
Source:
Golden Retriever Club of America National Health Survey, 1998-1999.
Prepared by Purdue School of Veterinary Medicine, L. Glickman, N.
Glickman, and R. Thorpe. Golden Retriever Foundation and Golden
Retriever Club of America.
Link: http://www.grca.org/healthsurvey.pdf
(Last accessed March 10, 2007)
Description: One of the Purdue University breed
studies. Detailed, long, and with more rigorous statistical
analyses than most other single-breed studies. Results based
on a questionnaire mailed to all GRCA members and posted on their web
site in 1998. Included only dogs alive in the period between 1993
and 1998. Multiple dog owners were asked to submit data for up to
5 dogs. 746 owners responded with information on 1444 dogs.
Mortality information based on 556 dogs, included 430 whose cause of
death was veterinarian determined. |
| Great
Dane |
American
Survey
Source
(American Survey): Great Dane Club of America. 2004. Great Dane
National Health Survey.
Link: http://www.gdca.org/health/healthsurvey.htm
(Last accessed March 15, 2007)
Description: This
is one of the research university surveys, so its design is unusually
good and valid statistical analyses were included. It was led by
Margaret Slater, a researcher at Texas A&M University. Surveys
mailed to Great Dane Club of America members, affiliate club members and
a random sample of 2000 owners of AKC registered Danes. Included Danes
alive and dead within a 5-year period, approximately 1997 to 2001,
inclusive. No breakdown of country of residence, but since surveys
where mailed to USA breed clubs and owners registered with the AKC, vast
majority would be expected to reside in USA or Canada. Total responses
included 519 households, 1565 total dogs, 1073 living, 452 dead, and 39
unknown. Longevity presented as median and averages.
European Survey
Source
(European Survey): Swiss Great Dane Club. 2007. Project Great
Dane Health '07. Published by the European Great Dane Club.
Link: http://www.great-danes.info/Health.htm
(In English. Last accessed March 11, 2007).
NOTE:
On the English language version (presumably a translation from the
original report), the word "diseased" appears to have
been used correctly in some places but also used when the word
"deceased" would have been correct.
Description:
A survey of European Danes. Respondents were from Switzerland,
Germany, France, Netherlands, and Spain. The translator appears to
have mixed up the words deceased and diseased and used
"diseased" for both. It makes the charts confusing to
interpret, but a reader can usually figure out from context whether
"deceased" should have been used. Results are broken down by color of dog. A total
of 512 dogs in the study, 188 deceased and 324 live. Appears
to have used average rather than median for longevity, but that might be
a translation error. |
| Great
Pyrenees |
Source:
Great Pyrenees Club of America. 1999. Great Pyrenees Club of America
Health Committee Report,
March 1999.
Link: http://www.gpcahealth.org/1999%20GPCA%20Health%20Survey.pdf
(Last accessed March 15, 2007)
Description: In 1997, a survey form was put on the
web. The survey results presented in this 1999 report include reports
from 914 owners with 1701 dogs. Majority of responses from USA.
Gives a map of state responses, but not clear whether those numbers are
for dogs or owners. Longevity calculations based on 454
dogs. Age at death is reported as both median and average, but
excludes accidental deaths (10.5% of dogs), dogs euthanized for
temperament reasons (9.1% of dogs), and dogs euthanized before 6 weeks
of age (probably 2%). If accidents and temperament euthanasia are
included, the median longevity would probably be about 9 yrs instead of
10 yrs (based on my calculations which were based on the weighted
averages of the median ages of death from each cause, which is NOT an
accurate method of calculation). Earlier
Survey Note: The 1999 survey report refers to an earlier survey from
1988 to 1991, but I was unable to access that survey. However, the
longevity results from the earlier survey are not comparable to the 1999
survey because a large group of dogs in the earlier survey were
recruited from the older population. The early survey, started in
1998 with dogs older than 8 years and then was expanded in 1991 to
include dogs of all ages. The 1988 and 1991 data were then
combined. Any longevity calculations would be skewed towards older
dogs. Later Survey Note: On
the Club website, there is also a 2002-2004 health survey. It
included 416 total dogs, 371 living, 39 deceased. (371+39 = 410,
not 416; presumably
living/dead status of the other 6 was unknown.) The deceased
included both recently dead dogs and dogs that had died "from years
ago". Causes of death are reported but, strangely, longevity
is not. |
| Greater
Swiss Mountain Dog |
Source: Greater
Swiss Mountain Dog Club of America Health Committee. October 2002.
Greater Swiss Mountain Dog Club of America Breed Health Survey 2002
& 2001.
Link: http://www.gsmdca.org/health/index.php
(Last accessed March 17, 2007)
Description: Based on a two-page questionnaire available
online and through the Greater Swiss Mountain Dog Club of America
newsletter. Included only dogs living at some time during the
years 2000 and 2001 in the United States. Responses were for 846
dogs, 775 living, 71 deceased. Longevity reported as median. Although this was not one of
the surveys done by a university research group, it is unusually
well-designed and well-analyzed survey. Statistical analyses were
conducted when comparing groups. |
| Irish
Setter |
Source:
Irish Setter Club of America 2003 National Health Survey. A
collaborative effort of the Irish Setter Club of America and The Purdue
University School of Veterinary Medicine, Section of Clinical
Epidemiology, L. Glickman, N. Glickman, and M. Raghavan.
Link: http://irishsetterclub.org/PDF/Health%20Survey%20Results.pdf
(Last accessed March 17, 2007)
Description: One
of the Purdue University breed studies. Respondents asked to include only dogs
alive as of January 1, 1996. Survey end date was December 31, 2003.
Distributed to Irish Setter owners via the Irish Setter Club of America
and its website. Usable responses received from 291 owners for 565
dogs (323 alive, 242 dead). 93.5% of respondents lived in the USA or
Canada. The Purdue group also conducted a similar survey in 1997,
which had 217 owners for 436 dogs (227 living, 209 dead). I was
unable to find a link to the 1997 survey. The 2003 survey included
an extensive comparison with the 1997 survey, but I could not figure out
the time span of the 1997 survey. (The Methods section of the 2003
survey was sparse and missing many details that had to be gleaned from
the tables.) Presumably, the 1997 survey covered approximately 1990 to
1995 or 1996. |
| Italian
Greyhound |
Source:
Slater, M. ~1994 (Surveys sent in 1993; no publication date
given). Report of a survey on health problems in Italian
Greyhounds. Health and Welfare Committee of the Italian Greyhound Club
of America and Health Committee of the Italian Greyhound Club of Greater
Houston.
Source: http://www.italiangreyhound.org/health/slater.html
(Last accessed March 31, 2007)
Description: For a survey done by a University
researcher (M. Slater, DVM, Texas A&M University), this is a
surprisingly sparse report, with some important details lacking,
however, it's not clear whether the report on the web was produced by
Slater or was a summary of Slater's report Included dogs alive as of August 1,
1993 and dogs that had died within the 5 yrs prior. Responses were
received for 2274 dogs. There were 1806 puppies, but it's clear
whether they were part of 2274 dogs or in addition to. Mortality
information based on 157 dogs that had died in the 5 years prior (1988
to 1993). Responses received from 41 USA states. Doesn't
mention any responses from other countries. Reported average
(rather than median) lifespan The leading
causes of death were accidents and old age, both claiming 41 each (26%)
of the 157 dogs. Because of the extraordinarily high accident
rate, it would have been informative to calculate mortality with
and without accidental deaths. There is no mean age of death
reported for the various causes of death, nor any standard deviation (or
quartile range) for the age at death. |
| Kerry
Blue Terrier |
Source:
Schellenberg, S. J., and M. L. Romsic. 1999. United States health
and genetics survey-1999. United States Kerry Blue Terrier Club.
Link: http://www.uskbtc.com/article.php/112
(Last accessed March 31, 2007)
Description: The survey was mailed in
fall, 1999 to USA and Canadian Kerry Blue Terrier Club members. It was
also posted on the USKBTC website. 98% of respondents were from
North America. Owners were asked about KBTs they had owned
since 1960. 230 owners responded, but the total number of adult
dogs in the study is not provided. 93 respondents provided
information about 558 litters with 2825 live puppies. Mortality
information for the entire period from 1960 to 1999 is based on usable
responses for 353 dogs: 160 dogs born 1950 to 1982 and 193 dogs born
1983 to 1999. Mortality of dogs born in the two time periods was
compared, but no adjustment was made for skewing of the most recent
group due to still-living dogs. |
| Leonberger |
Source:
Leonberger Club of America. 2002. Summary of the 2000 Health Survey
Findings. Leo Watch, Vol 2, Spring 2002.
Link: http://www.leowatch.org/PDFfiles/FinalPrintLeoWatch2002.pdf
(Last accessed July 4, 2007)
Description: 2000
health survey is second in a series of 5-yr health surveys, beginning in
1995. Haven't yet (as of July 4, 2007) acquired 1995 results,
which are not on-line. 2005 survey data collection is closed, but
no results posted yet (as of July 4, 2007). 2000 health survey
included reports of 805 dogs from 694 owners, representing 40% of total
registered dogs at that time. (A very impressive percentage of the
population.) Doesn't give country of residence of dogs. Included
89 deceased dogs, but 11 of those excluded from longevity stats because
they died in accidents (6), were lost, or were euthanised for
temperament (3). Report is brief, but reasonably complete. Includes
causes of mortality, bar charts of age at death, and summarized health
data of living dogs.
UK Single-breed Leonberger health
survey without lifespan data: Source:
1998 Health Survey. 1998. Lesley Gray via Leolink (now UKLA) and the
Leonberger Club of Great Britian. 2004 Health Survey. 2004.
Leolink, the UKLA newsletter. Link:
1998 Survey: www.uklaleos.com/Health_Welfare?Health/health.html
Last accessed October, 2007. Link:
2004 Survey: www.uklaleos.com/Health_Welfare/Health/2004_Overview/2004_overview.html
Last accessed October, 2007 Description:
These surveys had small sample sizes with only a brief summary of the
results. The 1998 survey included 91 dogs, of which only 5 were
deceased. No ages at death were reported. The 2004 survey included 79
dogs, of which 17 were deceased. Again, no ages at death were reported.
Although I could not use the surveys in my mortality tables, I include
the reference here because the health information is useful. |
| Manchester
Terrier |
Source: Johnson, A. M.
2002. Manchester Health and Genetics Survey, commissioned by the
American Manchester Terrier Club and the Canadian Manchester Terrier
Club. Published by Pedagogus, Inc.
Link: http://www.geocities.com/myamtc/health1.html
(Last accessed April 4, 2007)
Description: Survey mailed to all members of the American and
Canadian Manchester Terrier Clubs and made available on both club's
websites in the summer of 2002. Two reminders were sent to club
members. Owners were asked for information on their 6 most recent
terriers. Results were split into two time periods: 1960 to 1989 and
1990 to present (2002). Responses were received from 86
owners. Mortality information was received for 17 dogs that died
between 1960 and 1989 and 93 dogs (excluding puppies that died at or
shortly after birth) that died 1999 to 2002. The low N
for the earlier time period was probably due to the instructions to
select the six most recent dogs. The purpose was to avoid bias in
selecting dogs, but it created a sample size too low for reliable
comparisons. Of the 17 dogs in the earlier time period, 8 died of
accidents (5 dogs) or preventable infections (one each from parvo,
distemper, and heartworm). The sample size for health data, which included
living dogs, was much larger: 338 dogs in the period 1960-1989 and 1029
dogs from 1990 to 2002.
|
| Mastiff |
Source: Mastiff Club of
America, "preliminary" statistics posted on Club website as of
April 2007.
Link: http://mastiff.org/exhibit-hall/health/mhstats.mv
(Last accessed April 9, 2007)
Description: Data for these "preliminary statistics"
were evidently obtained via an online survey. Although the brief
initial paragraph suggests the survey is on-going and there is on online
survey form, the youngest dog in the preliminary data was born in
2000. The online statistics do not appear to have been updated in
many years. Data based on 570 dogs, of which 558 resided in the
USA or Canada. Mortality data based on 94 dogs.
Median/Average not explicitly reported. I calculated median (6.5 yrs)
and average (6.6 yrs) from the on-line table of the number of dogs that died at each
age.
|
| Miniature
Bull Terrier |
Source: Health
Survey Report 2002-2004. Miniature Bull Terrier Club of America. Link:
http://www.minibull.org/survey.htm
(Last accessed April 10, 2007)
Description: Based on heath survey from 2002-2004. Received
reports from 184 living and 53 (or 54?) deceased dogs. Average (rather
than median) age at death reported, but also reported youngest age at
death (0.25 yr), oldest (14.5), number of dogs dying between 0 and 2.5
yrs (15, = 28%), between 3 and 8.5 yrs (18, = 33%) and 9 to 14.5
yrs (21 = 39%). The sum of 15, 18, and 21 is 54 (not 53) deceased
dogs, but it is unclear which number is incorrect. No indication
of where the dogs resided, but an earlier 1998 health survey received
responses exclusively from the USA. The earlier 1998 survey was
fairly sparse and did not include mortality data, but did include owners
estimates of Mini Bull lifespans, which provided an interesting contrast
to the actual lifespan.
|
| Norwich
Terrier |
Source: Norwich
Health Survey. 2003. Report to the Norwich Terrier Club of America.
Conducted by M. Slater, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M
University.
Link: http://www.norwichandnorfolkterrier.org/norwichsurvey.html
(Last accessed April 10, 2007)
Description: Survey mailed to current and
former Norwich Terrier Club members in February 2003. Two reminders
sent. 251 owners (response rate of 64%) returned surveys for 1075 dogs
(807 living and 268 deceased). No breakdown of the geographic
locations of respondents. Included statistical analysis of the
influence of sex on health problems. The response rate for this survey
was unusually high, which the report writers thought was due to the
"self-explanatory and simple to complete survey format and the
interest level of the participants."
|
| Nova
Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever |
Source: 2002
Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever Health Survey. Toller Health
Committee.
Link: http://www.toller.ca/tollerhealth/SurveySummary.html
(Last accessed April 10, 2007)
Description: Covered dogs
alive at
some time between 1992 and 2002. Survey mailed to members of
Toller clubs in several countries and made available online. The
survey was also translated into Finnish and Swedish. Received
responses from 650 owners covering 1180 Tollers. Mortality
calculations based on 141 dogs that died during this period.
Although more than 50% of responses were from the USA or Canada, they
were more evenly distributed across multiple countries than most other
surveys because of the efforts to reach owners outside North
America. Distribution of responses was: USA 31%, Canada 26%,
Finland 14%, Sweden 10%, Australia 6%, Denmark 4%, UK 3%, 6 countries
below 1%, and Unreported 5%.
|
| Otterhound |
Source: Otterhound
Health Surveys, 2003 Survey and 1996 Survey. Otterhound Club of America
Link: http://clubs.akc.org/ohca/OH-surveys.html
(Last accessed April 12, 2007)
Description: Extremely brief reports of 1996
and 2003 health surveys. No geographic distribution given but apparently
most dogs were from the USA and Canada. 1996 survey included 103
dogs (97 living and 6 dead) which the report said was over 25% of the
Otterhounds in the USA and Canada at the time. 2003 survey included 119
dogs (78 living and 41 dead), which the report said was over 20% of the
Otterhounds in the USA and Canada at the time. No longevity calculated
from the 1996 survey because of the low sample size. Longevity
calcs included median age at death (10.8), mean (9.5), and some
distribution information: 0-7 yrs, 6 dogs; 7-9.9 yrs: 9 dogs, 26 lived
more than 10 yrs, 14 lived more than 12 yrs, and 9 lived to between 13
and 14.75.
Note: On the Otterhound Club health
page http://clubs.akc.org/ohca/OH-health.html
there is a link to a bar chart of life spans of 210 Otterhounds: http://clubs.akc.org/ohca/life-span.jpg
This bar chart is not from the 2003 health survey (which had only 41 deceased
dogs), but there is nothing to indicate where the data are from.
The median I calculated from the bar chart data (10 yrs) is similar to the median of the 41
dogs in the 2003 health survey, as is the distribution of mortality. It
would be nice to know the source of the bar chart data and the time
period it covers, since the sample size is
much larger than in the 2003 health survey.
|
| Papillon |
Source:
Papillon Club of America Health and Genetics, Summary of Findings 2002.
Link: http://www.papillonclub.org/PapillonHealth/enter.html
(Last accessed April 15, 2007). This link provided links to both the
2000 and 2002 surveys in either html or Word format. The 2000
health survey does not have longevity information.
Description: This survey had one of the most
poorly written reports of the breed club surveys I read. There
is no introduction or methods section or any hint (except the 2002 in
the title) of the years covered by the survey.
It is not clear how many
owners and dogs were involved. Almost all of the results of the
survey are reported as percentages with no other sample size
information. The only sample size given for any
of the data is "N = 698" in a table titled "Years of
Involvement." of respondents with Papillons. It
suggests the 698 is the number of owners. If so, it would be among
the largest sample sizes of any single breed survey I've found.
The mean number of living Papillons per owner is given as 3.57; the mean
number of deceased Papillons per owner is 1.23. If the number of
owners was 698, the number of living Papillons in the survey was 2,492
and the number of deceased Papillons was 859. If 698 was the
number of Papillons (instead of owners) in the survey, then (based on the mean number of
living plus dead Papillons/owner), the number of respondents would have
been 145. The number of living Papillons would have been about 519
and the number of dead about 179. Either way, it appears to have had a large number of
respondents and the report deserves a good rewrite.
Longevity reported as both median (13.0) and mean (11.45). I used the
median in the breed data table. |
| Petit
Basset Griffon Vendeen |
Source: Kovaleff,
L. 2001. Report on the state of health of the Petit Basset Griffon
Vendeen. Based on the 2000 Health Survey unterdaken by the Petit
Basset Griffon Vendeen Club of America.
Link: http://www.pbgv.org/PBGVCA/Committee/healthSurvey.html
(Last accessed April 12, 2007)
Description: Surveys mailed to all Petit Basset
Griffon Vendeen (PBGV) Club of America members and other known PBGV
owners and posted on the Club website. Included all PBGV who lived
with the respondent on January 1, 2000 and any that had lived with
the respondent at the time of death since January 1, 1995.
Received responses from 250 owners for 640 dogs. An average
lifespan and standard deviation (12.7 yrs ± 3.88 yrs) were reported but
the author never explicitly reports the number of deceased dogs.
However, it was stated that there were an average of 2.38 live dogs
living with each of the 250 respondents of January 1, 2000, which,
according to my calculations, comes out to 595 live dogs. Since
there were 640 total dogs, the number of deceased dogs, I concluded, was
about 45. The PBGV Club website also includes a comparison of the
2000 health survey with a 1994 health survey, but there was apparently
no longevity calculated in the 1994 survey.
|
| Polish
Lowland Sheepdog |
Source: American
Polish Lowland Sheepdog Club on-line, continuously changing
survey.
Link: http://www.aponc.com/polish_lowland_sheepdog_longevity_survey.htm
(Click on link "To view statistics here." Last accessed April
12, 2007)
Description: This is an ongoing on-line
survey with a link to the current statistics. The statistics
change as respondents add new dogs. At the time I last accessed
(April 12, 2007) there were 52 dogs entered, 33 live and 19
deceased. The survey shows the number of dogs dying in each age
range. No median or mean is calculated on the web site, but there is
sufficient data for the user to calculate it. About 67% of
surveyed dogs resided in the USA, 19% in Switzerland, 12% in France, and
2% in Poland.
|
| Rottweiler |
Source:
Slater, M. ~2001. Rottweiler Health Foundation Survey Results. American
Rottweiler Club.
Link: http://www.rottweilerhealth.org/RHF_surveyresults.html
(Last accessed April 14, 2007)
Description: Questionnaire distributed twice
(March 2000 and July 2000) to 1200 subscribers of the quarterly
newsletter of the American Rottweiler Club. The questionnaire was also
sent to 41 local Rottweiler clubs in the USA and Canada for
distribution. A Rottweiler club in Italy also distributed the
survey. Owners were asked about health information for dogs owned since
1994. Responses were received from 225 owners for 1035 dogs, 717 living
and 318 deceased. The vast majority of responses were from the USA
and Canada, but 10 Italian owners responded with information about 27
dogs (25 living, 2 deceased). It is not clear whether the Italian
results were included in the main report, since the end of the report
includes a separate discussion of the Italian responses. This
survey report was written by a University researcher (M. Slater, Texas
A&M University), It included statistical analyses of association
between sex and common health problems.
|
| Scottish
Deerhound |
Source:
Scottish Deerhound Club of America. Probably ~ 2000. Health
Problems of Scottish Deerhounds.
Link: http://www.deerhound.org/health_study.shtml
(Last accessed April 14, 2007)
Description: Survey conducted "during the
1990s." Neither the specific dates of the survey nor limits
(if any) on the time period during which dogs lived were given in the
report. The survey was done by the SDCA's Health and Genetics committee,
but the report supplies no information on how the survey was distributed
or where the dogs lived. Presumably, most lived in the USA or Canada. Data
were obtained from 80 owners with "over 450" dogs.
The number of living vs
deceased dogs is not specified in the report. Possibly, the survey
included only deceased dogs. In other breed surveys where both living and
deceased
dogs were included, deceased dogs usually accounted for a third to a fifth
of the total. So, the mortality calculations were probably based
on at least 80 dogs and possibly all 450+ dogs. I was unable to
determine the number of deceased dogs with email requests.
Despite the
laxity in sample size reporting, the presentation of the mortality
data is fairly good The report writers provided a table of
Scottish Deerhound life expectancy at 2-year intervals and the average
age at death for each major health problem. The leading causes of
death within 3-yr intervals was also tabulated. Data for males and
females was provided separately. There was no statistical analysis to
determine whether male/female health differences were significant.
|
| Scottish Terrier |
Source: Orsborn,
J. 2005 STCA Health Survey Data Report. Scottish Terrier Club of
America.
Link: http://www.stca.biz/2005HealthSurveyData.htm
(Last accessed April 14, 2007)
Description: Surveys were sent to
Scottish Terrier club members. Local clubs were also provided with
50 survey copies to distribute to non-club members with STs, ST puppy
buyers, and grooming clients with STs. For the Health and Disease survey
(there was also a Reproductive survey for breeding info), 450 owners
supplied information on 1,407 dogs, including 269 deceased dogs,
of which 266 were used in longevity calculations. It is not clear why 3
dogs were excluded from longevity calculations, but probably there was
insufficient data for those three or there is a typo in the
report. The survey date was July 1, 2005 and it appears (it is not
clear in the report) that respondents were instructed to include only
dogs that had been living in the 2 year period prior to the survey
date. The Scottie Club had also done a 1995 health survey covering
the period 1993-1994. The 2005 report provided a good comparison
of the two surveys and was a better source of information about the 1995
survey than the 1995 report, which is sparse.
The 2005 report is fairly well-presented, but both the
1995 and 2005 surveys had problems with poor phrasing of some
questions. For the longevity question in the 1995 survey, owners
were asked for the average lifespan of Scotties that they had owned,
rather than the lifespans of individual Scotties. While some
respondents probably calculated the average longevities of previous
dogs, others likely estimated without calculating and some owners
apparently included living Scotties in the average. Furthermore,
the analyst was left calculating averages of averages, without knowing
how many individuals were included in each respondent's estimated
average. In the 2005 survey, the question was asked the same way,
but information was also collected specifically for the 266 dogs that
had died during the survey period. The average of the respondents'
estimated longevities in 1995 was 11.2; in 2005 it was 11.1. The
actual average longevity of the 266 (or 269?) deceased dogs was 10.7 (the
number I used in my table).
|
| Soft-coated
Wheaten Terrier |
Source:
Slater, M. R. 2000. General Health Survey on Soft-coated Wheaten
Terriers. Soft-coated Wheaten Terrier Club of America.
Link: http://www.scwtca.org/HlthSrvIntro00.html
(Last accessed April 14, 2007)
Description: Questionnaires
sent in late 1999 with reminders in February 2000. Sent to current and
former club members, a breed magazine subscription list, and a list of
Canadian Wheaten owners. Covered dogs since 1994. Received
information from 521 owners for 1246 dogs (997 living, 249
deceased). No information on country of residence, but since
surveys were sent only to USA and Canadian owners, presumably most or
all respondents lived in one of those two countries.
This is one of the reports
written by a M. Slater (a researcher at Texas A&M University).
It is reasonably well-written, but the
web-site report has some problems with misaligned columns in many of the
tables. Includes statistical analyses for association between sex and
common health issues.
|
| Standard
Poodle |
Source:
Data collected as part of John Armstrong's Canine Diversity Project
. http://www.canine-genetics.com/health.htm#life
Graph of Standard Poodle data at:
Link: See Source. (Last accessed
April 16, 2007)
Description and Comments:
One of John Armstrong's
on-line surveys done in the late 1990s. He had longevity data on 988
Standard Poodles, 361 born prior to 1982 and 627 born 1982 and
1999. The post-1982 data were corrected to adjust for dogs still
living. |
| Wire-haired
Pointing Griffon |
Source: American
Wire-haired Pointing Griffon Association and the Purdue University
School of Veterinary Medicine. National Health Survey 2002-2003.
Link: http://www.vet.purdue.edu/epi/wpg.pdf
(Last accessed April 15, 2007)
Description: One of
the Purdue University breed surveys. Covered dogs alive or born between
January 1, 1995 and January 1, 1999.Usable responses received from 129
owners for 182 dogs, 166 still living and 16 dead by the study end. 89%
of responses were from USA, 11% from Canada, and 1% from France.
Longevities presented as median and means and for males and females.
Includes statistical analyses for associations between health issues and
various factors. Because the sample size for deceased dogs was so small,
few meaningful conclusions can be drawn from longevity comparisons
between subgroups.
|
John Armstrong's on-line
surveys from the late 1990s. John Armstrong was a
biologist and geneticist at the University of Ottawa, specializing in
the development of axolotls (a type of salamander). He became
interested in the health issues of purebred dogs because of health
problems with his poodles and started the Canine Diversity
project. As part of the project, he collected longevity data on
Standard Poodles, Australian Shepherds, Clumber Spaniels, and
Mixed-Breed dogs. He
died suddenly while he had manuscripts in peer review regarding
longevity trends in these breeds. He had posted graphs and partial
information about his data on-line. Those pages are still being maintained (see
links above the the three breeds and the mixed breed) but no new data are being
added.
The Purdue Studies. Several breed clubs
contracted with the Purdue University School of Veterinary Medicine, Section of
Clinical Epidemiology for their breed health survey. Dr. Larry Glickman
was lead author on the studies. Breeds surveyed to date (that I found
reports for) are Airedale Terrier, Akita, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, Golden
Retriever, Irish Setter, and Wire-haired Pointing Griffon. Reports from
these studies are usually over 200 pages long. They are generally more
comprehensive and better written than the breed club studies done by people
unfamiliar with research. Still, they had a few flaws. The
methodology sections are "boiler-plate" but sometimes were not proofed
well-enough to accurately describe differences in methods between breeds.
While some potential environmental influences on health were subjected to
statistical analyses, other effects on longevity (e.g., sex or source of puppy)
were compared without statistics. Longevities were variously reported as
averages and medians.
Update History for this page
Oct 14, 2007 - Minor spelling, grammar fixes, plus addition of information
about methodology of the Akita survey.
Dec. 26, 2007 - Add citation for 1997 Flat-coated Retriever survey.
Dec. 27, 2007 - Add citation for two UK Leonberger health surveys from 1998
and 2004. Both had small sample sizes with no information on age at death, so
they did not supply any additional mortality data. Also did some minor
proofing.
Feb. 1, 2008 - Add citation and linked translation for German Boxer health
survey.
|